User talk:Boneless Pizza!/Archive 19

Archive 15

←

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Hello!

Hey, GP. How're you doing these days? Haven't heard from you in awhile so I figured I'd just stop in and say hi. :) sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi, got bored at Wikipedia these days. Thou, I check what's happening often. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 12:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I just visited the Ermac page the first time in awhile, noticed that it was locked, and soon found out why. Thanks for your help in maintaining law and order in there. Cheers. :) sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 00:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Sourcing

This seems like it'd be extremely simple to find a reference for? jp×g🗯️ 19:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Reverted edits on Mario

Can you give me a source that say wikis are not allowed in Wikipedia even if it's from reliable sources? Kazama16 (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Greenish Pickle! Also these were IGN guides about power ups not wikis, although I don't know what's the difference. Kazama16 (talk) 14:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

.....Oh, now finally you can talk after dismissing my advice on your talk page? See [1] GreenishPickle! (🔔) 17:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I'm really sorry, I got frustrated finding sources and got no clue that wikis aren't allowed in Wikipedia. Deeply sorry ☺️ and thanks for your contributions to King's article. Also don't put only bare URLs take your time to make citations with full information like author, date, title, etc. Kazama16 (talk) 20:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Hi

@Greenish Pickle!, In an article recently merged with the afd where is consensus made to know? The dogcat (talk) 02:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Little clarification

I would like to show you my workflow for AFC so that you might understand how far I got into the review.
1: Quick fails

 A: copyvio (If it’s not huge, let the page creator have a say)
  B: Vandalism/test
 C:Attack

—Stopped here—
E: violates what Wikipedia is not
2: Main review (don’t start if quick failed)
A:notable?
B:Sourced?
C:NPOV
D:BLP
Loosely based off of this
File:Flow chart for AFC 3.1.png
Hope this helps you understand my position: I ask that you mind how your implications come off to me.
Thank you for reading this wall of text Geardona (talk to me?) 05:28, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

File:Ada and Leon.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ada and Leon.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Mai Shiranui

Can you please check out this article so many sources and so much mess. 39.50.255.241 (talk) 17:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

It is time consuming and I have zero interest in that character, but maybe I'll try to remove few of them. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 22:33, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sans (Undertale)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sans (Undertale) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sans (Undertale)

The article Sans (Undertale) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Sans (Undertale) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 21:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Your edit to Sans (Undertale) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 14:57, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sans (Undertale)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sans (Undertale) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sans (Undertale)

The article Sans (Undertale) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sans (Undertale) for comments about the article, and Talk:Sans (Undertale)/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cocobb8 -- Cocobb8 (talk) 15:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks/Deletion Discussions and... Discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello Greenish Pickle! I know I have been of few words lately. But it has been very exciting to see Sans (Undertale) take to becoming a good article because of your contributions to it. Your work comes much appreciated. Thank you

Now, however, there has been an iffy part of your history that I've had my eye on lately that I would like to suggest you can approve. This is regarding your nomination of Charlie Morningstar for deletion; IP users are humans too. They permeate even the most important discussions of Wikipedia and its process. Their work is as important as ours, and for those reasons, we approach them with the same good faith we know our named contributors have.

I agree with your nomination of Vaggie for deletion. But your nomination and subsequent reversal of your idea of the Charlie Morningstar article's future, or lack thereof could have been easily held with a discussion on the article's associated talk page first. I would recommend that course of action on articles that may not obviously be warranting deletion, like Vaggie.

Thank you for reading. I will see you around! ~ GoatLordServant^(Talk) 02:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Well, about Charlie thing, I'll take some criticism with it that it was a bit rushed to be sent out away, thou that IP is likely the same person; see here [2]. But, anyway I hope we don't lose our history on the Sans article just because of that. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 02:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

That was indeed who I was. 2019... augh. that hurts my brain. But yes, it was indef semiprotted because of the character's obvious interest for vandals. Anyways, since all of that, I've settled my editing pattern to focus mainly on the small things that I notice are off as a reader. I would probably be much more proficient in the article creation sphere if finding sources that are not blocked on my laptop was an easier process. Thank you for deciding that Sans was worth it, lol.

I strongly doubt HistoryDay01 actually pulled any meatpuppetry/sockpuppetry. They have been around long enough to know that behavior gets your presence on this site absolutely decimated. I have watched that happen quite a bit. As much as it may have been HistoryDay, it could also be any other honest contributor or any deceitful one looking to troll. ~ GoatLordServant^(Talk) 02:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Old users can do such that, like WP:LTA, thou Im not accusing of him being as an LTA but because when you look at IP and user's contribution, it looks very suspicious especially what the admin said, but anyway Im moving on at this one. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 02:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Tagging pages for deletion

Hello, Greenish Pickle!,

I was reviewing Fruti Kola which you PROD'd and I have a request. Please consider using Twinkle for tagging pages for deletion, whether that's CSD, PROD or AFD/RFD/CFD/etc. It's a very user-friendly editing tool used by most page patrollers and many administrators because it makes the process so easy. For one thing, it leaves an informative edit summary. This is especially important for PROD'd articles because if an article is de-PROD'd, if it gets tagged again, the admin needs to see it's already been PROD'd and that is done by looking at the edit summaries in the page history. Additionally, once you set up your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator", when you tag an article for deletion, Twinkle will post a notification on the user talk page of the page creator which is an important step in the deletion process. Twinkle will take care of this so you don't need to do so. Twinkle will allow you to do all sorts of other activities besides tagging pages for deletion like tagging articles for problems, reporting vandals to noticeboards, maintain a deletion log for you, set up an AFD discussion, welcome new editors, it's really invaluable once you start using it so I encourage you to give it a try. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

It's a bit tricky for me to use Twinkle, which is why I actually do it manually. Thou, I might give it a shot. Many thanks. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 01:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Reverted edit on Sora (Kingdom Hearts)

Hi, could you please explain why you consider the source I put during my edit on Sora to be unreliable? That website has been used for sources all across wikipedia. Osh33m (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

@Greenish Pickle!: I just want to point out that you didn't tell me that Valnet sources shouldn't be used. You never told me that. You never told me anything, which is why I reverted your edit. I don't even know what you mean by Valnet. Osh33m (talk) 00:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Oh I see. Apologize for that. Valnet sources are like GameRant, ScreenRant and etc. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 00:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

but why? those sources have reliable information. why should wikipedia avoid using them as sources? Osh33m (talk) 14:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

The way you added it on reception were unnecessary. We can use Valnet sources thou, but not really at the reception section. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 22:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Factions of Halo

Hi @Greenish Pickle!, I undid your edit on Factions of Halo because a consensus was not achieved in the AfD discussion. CanonNi (talk) 03:21, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Mushroom Kingdom for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mushroom Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mushroom Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~ A412 ^talk! 23:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Samus and Mii

The importance rating for the Video Games WikiProject requires High-Importance characters to be iconic and widely recognized outside of their series. Samus is not at this level, she is not very well-known outside of Metroid and Smash Bros. She is closer to the Mid-Importance criteria, as a protagonist of a popular series.

On the other hand, the Miis easily meet this criteria. The 3DS online shutting down has nothing to do with it. The Miis are iconic to Smash and the Wii series, as well as starring in Tomodachi Life and Miitopia, and being playable in several Mario spinoffs, among other things. They were the first Nintendo characters to get a mobile game, and they are some of the only ones to be pre-installed on Nintendo consoles. Everybody who has played modern Nintendo games knows what a Mii is. Other companies even started to copy Nintendo, like Xbox with the Xbox avatar. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I won't edit war over this so I'll only do one reversion but I do find a Mid-tier assessment insufficient. She's regarded as one of the most influential female characters, and considered the first female character to star in a video game by many, discounting characters like Ms. Pac-Man due to them being based on another character. I don't really like edit wars over importance, but that's my piece. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 23:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

@Cukie Gherkin and Greenish Pickle!: I am fine with putting Samus at High-Importance for the main project and task force, and I could be convinced that she is Top-Importance for game characters. I just do not see how she is more iconic than Sephiroth, Goomba, Ganon, Kirby, etc. However, I will not object to her being listed as Top-Importance. As for Mii, I do not want to edit war, but I am dying on this hill. There is a lot I could say about them, but I will save it for now. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, what do you want Mii assessed at? - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

He rated Mii's importance as "Top" and I was like "are you serious?" So, reverted it into high for now. I feel like its mid but oh well. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 23:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I wanted it placed at Top-Importance. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Also, Samus isn't rated high compare to Sephiroth and etc. They were rated the same thing. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

They are currently. They are only at the same level because I brought Samus down. She was previously rated at the same level as Mario, Cloud, and Sonic. Like I said above, I am fine if you or Cukie wants to put her back at Top-Importance, I just doubted how iconic she is compared to these other characters. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

My best bet would be High not top. But, she is still well known if you have a video gaming background. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 23:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I would agree that High-Importance fits in this case. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I started a discussion about character importance ratings at WT:VGCHAR. QuicoleJR (talk) 00:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Ermac (again)

Okay, new image finally uploaded (had to do it twice due to a defect on the first one). I was also going to tell you that someone overhauled the hell out of the appearances section. Thanks for reverting it but I guess it's a sign that I needed to tighten it up myself. I'm hoping that the whole mask debacle will lead to some meaty reception in the near future. And finally an "Eek!" at the nice big reptilian creature above. :) sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 05:10, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

add <nowiki>{{db-author}}<nowiki> to your first image to be speedy deleted. The fact that he removed his appearance also in ''Mortal Kombat X'' is a sign that it kinda needs to be reverted. For reception, at least you got the ign one [3] and Gamespot for additional info [4] Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 05:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

GOCE on Sans

Hi! I'm in the middle of making edits, and I had to stop because of over-lapping with your edits. I will take a break, and return later; but if you could hold off making changes while I'm making changes? Otherwise things will get lost. If you want to undo my edits after I am done, that's super ok by me; but doing it at the same time causes confusion.

Sorry I'm slow. I'll be done soon with language suggestions and other: whatever you don't like, you can take out. Ok?

Thanks. I'll go away for a bit now. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 14:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

oops sorry, I did not see the tag here at mobile Ok not touching the article for now. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 14:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

no worries. I'll let you know when I'm done. bye — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 15:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Ok, I've finished copy edit, and removed {in use} tag. And left comments on talk page.
I did change the lead again, per your instructions: thanks!! that really helped. I also tweaked a lot in section on Japanese version of Sans, using the source for guidance: I think I got it all right!? And I did add some white space throughout, to break a little the wall of text. Feel free to change that, or anything—just trying to help make this article more super.
I did also note that the dates in the citations (starting about no. 40) are in the wrong format (not mm-dd-yy but mm-yy-dd or yy-dd-mm). If I have time, later, I may go back to try and fix dates; but this didn't stop the GAN process before, so maybe not that important for now.
Good luck on the DYKN. Thanks for your patience. Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 16:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Many thanks for your effort. I really appreciate it! I will recheck it tomorrow. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 16:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Great! Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 18:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Good, you saw my little edit, after the fact. Also made another 2 minor fixes, b/c I was told, on talk from previous article, that I misunderstood some "standard grammar" issue about semi-colons. My bad.

Also will fix 1 more sentence that's kinda too long, about PSR stuff, but I need to read source again. Want to make easier to understand/ more focused on Sans, not a little mini-lecture. Blah blah blah. Just to make it better, NO MAJOR changes: then I'm out. But not tonight. And the stuff that got added/subtracted in lead looks REALLY good. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 02:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks again =). GreenishPickle! (🔔) 02:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar: that was really kind of you. I very much enjoyed working on the article and learning about Sans. Be well. — Yogabear2020 (N.B. NoviceEditor; Talk) 11:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Cloud Strife

I saw you reverted my edit. It's okay I just want to let you know that not just concept but "Appearances" section is also filled with primary sources its either a primary video game source or a book published by Square Enix. I would be grateful if you replaced them with secondary sources as much as you can. Thanks. 39.50.246.233 (talk) 02:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Its fine to use in appearances also, as long as its not excessive. If its on the reception section, it should be definitely removed. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:25, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

There are at least more than 50 primary sources in my guess. It highly relies on primary sources when its come to concept and appearances section. Like look at other video game characters article they don't include that much primary sources. It really needs some secondary sources that's why I ask you if you could do some help. Thanks sir. 39.50.246.233 (talk) 02:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Hmm. Restored your the template tag now. I don't wanna spend most of my time on that article since I don't really have interest. Sorry. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Why don't you create account thou? I've seen you plenty of times, and your dynamic IP keeps changing. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm really not interested in Wikipedia because of its weird rules, but I would do some help if there is misinformation or unnecessary details in articles. Thanks for asking thou. Much appreciated. 39.50.246.233 (talk) 02:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

What kind of weird rules btw? I could maybe help you with that. Well, you know Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Video game characters is improving this generation now. Most of the listicles/rankings that does not say valuable stuff or irrelevant ones in the articles (like you're dealing with Mai) now are already removed + Most of non-notable characters ended up being merged and the growing of GA articles within the character articles. Greenish Pickle! (🔔) 02:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baker family

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Baker family you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:43, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zombies in Resident Evil

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Zombies in Resident Evil you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:44, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zombies in Resident Evil

The article Zombies in Resident Evil you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil and Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Zombies in Resident Evil

The article Zombies in Resident Evil you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil for comments about the article, and Talk:Zombies in Resident Evil/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert Wesker

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Albert Wesker you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Baker family

The article Baker family you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Baker family for comments about the article, and Talk:Baker family/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 03:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Mutant

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Mutant you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shulk

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shulk you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 11:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Mutant

The article Super Mutant you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Super Mutant for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 20:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert Wesker

The article Albert Wesker you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Albert Wesker and Talk:Albert Wesker/GA3 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 00:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Albert Wesker

The article Albert Wesker you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Albert Wesker for comments about the article, and Talk:Albert Wesker/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 01:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Peach 2023.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Peach 2023.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you

I have been pulling my hair out with how badly written Ultraman Belial and Ultraman Tregear are. Thank you for putting them on AFD. (I have also explained why I didn't do it myself.) 50.113.53.158 (talk) 23:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

You can vote to AfD on whatever your opinion is. I mean, if you're only an IP, you can only vote at AfD, but you can't nominate articles. So, why don't you create? There's no age requirement anyway. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 03:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

I already said this elsewhere, but I am 16 and my parents are unsure about it. 50.113.53.158 (talk) 03:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

"Unsure". This is just a free encyclopedia anyway, its not like they're gonna do something with your email address. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 03:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Either way, thank you again. 50.113.53.158 (talk) 03:39, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shulk

The article Shulk you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Shulk and Talk:Shulk/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 09:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bella Goth

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bella Goth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:41, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bella Goth

The article Bella Goth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bella Goth and Talk:Bella Goth/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

GA reviews

Per the notice when creating a review page, the current practice is to not use Level-2 headers (meaning ==this kind==) for GA review pages, and instead use Level-3 headers (meaning ===this kind===) to divide the review into sections. This stops the review from making several new sections on the article's talk page when transcluded. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:01, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Einstein. I'll recommend you to finish Dizzy's GAN thou. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 23:10, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

I plan on it. I have just not had much time to conduct a thorough review of an entire article lately. I will hopefully finish it tonight. QuicoleJR (talk) 23:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bella Goth

The article Bella Goth you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bella Goth for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Sans (Undertale)

On 29 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sans (Undertale), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sans's boss theme, "Megalovania", was played at the Vatican as part of a circus act during an audience with Pope Francis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sans (Undertale). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sans (Undertale)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Deleting Ultraseven

Look, I'm willing to go with negotiations if you want to delete an Ultraman page. But please, do it properly. File an AfD first, then provide your reason, but please make sure that you presented it reasonable and sound. If you say that "Oh, this page lacks general notability", nobody would've looked at you as a sane person. Discuss it with all the people around to convince them to agree to your reasoning.

And one more thing; Ultraseven appears in Ultraseven. He's not in the 1966 Ultraman TV series. It also shows here just how lacking your knowledge in the subject you want to focus on and not bother doing proper research.

Zero stylinx (talk) 03:28, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shulk

The article Shulk you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shulk for comments about the article, and Talk:Shulk/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ProtoDrake -- ProtoDrake (talk) 10:01, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Cool username

Hey from a fellow pickle! Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 00:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello there! Yours is crunchy, and mine was more on the greenish side. 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 00:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For all of the work that you do cleaning up the character articles, protecting them when needed, and for helping to get them to GA. ;) Fieryninja (talk) 17:27, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks Master =) 🥒Greenish Pickle!🥒 (🔔) 22:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Biography of living persons policy.

Even ignoring the dubious sourcing, your edit to the Herschel Weingrod article was grossly inappropriate. If as source (any source, even a legitimate one) uses the term 'allegedly' about something, we don't cite said source, repeating the allegation as fact. Not for anything. Never. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:36, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

I see your edit has now been revdelled. You may find these discussions of interest. [5][6]. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Oopsie, I won't be touching that article after that anyway. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Shantae

Greetings my friend. Can you archive Shantae (character). I have been trying to archive it but fails everytime I try, so maybe you can help me with that. Have a great day! Kazama16 (talk) 08:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Same thing that happen to me "spamblacklist". 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 08:23, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion of Malhun Hatun (fictional character ) page

why you nominated this page for deletion? It is a main character page of series kurulus osman why you have nominated it? Bluesapphire1999 (talk) 03:40, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Cloud Strife

Apparently no one has been keeping an eye on Cloud Strife recently. I'm new to that article but there have been loads of strange edits. Could you have a look? Fieryninja (talk) 22:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Those edits doesn't look constructive, so we're just gonna revert them. It's a bit odd that the rampant IP edits thou. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:54, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

I have a feeling some of the cited content might have been deleted amongst all of those ip edits too. Fieryninja (talk) 22:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

If we can spot something we can revert it rightaway. Unfortunately, no one is interested at that article;thus no one has watchlisted it. I'm also one of those fella. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 23:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi again

I just wanted to let someone know that I have some requests on WT:AFD. I assume that nobody has seen them yet, but they're there. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:E1EB:7896:3BB9:E89F (talk) 22:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Replying to confirm that you saw this. 2605:B40:13E7:F600:E1EB:7896:3BB9:E89F (talk) 02:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

Why did you revert my edits (Chris Redfield)?

Good Evening, the Chris Redfield article requires improvement (add references, reduce bias etc.). Why did you revert my edits? I'd like to discuss the matter with you at your talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with you. Sincerely, Mary Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 01:28, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.

If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 02:20, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Nice copypaste 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 04:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chris Redfield. Please do not remove information from articles that is backed up by reliable sources, gaming magazine or otherwise. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:24, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

What are you admin? HAHAHA 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 07:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm an editor. Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 07:27, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

disrespectful comments are not allowed. see: Wikipedia:Civility Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 17:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Disrespectful comments are incivil behavior. see: Wikipedia:Civility Mary.Perry.Panda (talk) 17:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Bella Goth

The article Bella Goth you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Bella Goth for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Maplestrip -- Maplestrip (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Deprodding of Teamspeak

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Teamspeak, which you proposed for deletion. I personally believe the page is notable because TeamSpeak is used commonly. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! MessageApp (talk) 18:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Your username

Do pizzas usually have bones?? QuicoleJR (talk) 15:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

That's why they're "boneless" 😛 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

What about the crust? 47.153.138.166 (talk) 06:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Albert Wesker

On 1 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Albert Wesker, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Albert Wesker's character design evokes the aesthetic of the Nazi ideal of the Übermensch, reflecting Resident Evil's "core" theme of eugenics? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Albert Wesker. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Albert Wesker), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:04, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit summaries

I understand that you're frustrated with this other editor, but you can't just resort to comments like this. That just violates WP:NPA. Please don't do that. Sergecross73 msg me 20:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

Unrelated, but isn't this personal attack too much? [7] [8] [9] 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 11:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

How are these "personal attack"? Adding a synthesis and bad writing ≠ others personally attacking you. And what do these summaries have to do with you? This is about you describing someone else as a "moron". Don't change the topic to an editor pointing out that something is badly written. ภץאคгöร 16:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh, at least I admitted that I have made some mistakes unlike you who have been sent to ANI before. I knew you were often following my edits, but what ever it is maybe it could be better to stop saying with that kind of edit summaries. Callinf disruptive other editor who is also currently working at the article maybe discourage them. I mean you were also helpful, just the edit summaries who is annoying sometimes. That's all. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 20:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

You literally did not admit anything here and immediately linked my edit summaries in your reply as if pointing out MOS:PUFFERY, WP:SYNTH, and editing that disrupts progress is a "personal attack". Stop name-calling others and following my edit summaries. ภץאคгöร 13:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

I did admit, but offwiki. Nobody is following your edit summaries, it is the page we watchlisted and worked out for long time. (I don't see any point in making this discussion longer now) 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 17:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 17:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Vinland Saga (TV series)

This is a recent article that was copyedited, was promoted to GA, then further copyedited by another user only to have the review automatically undone due to second thoughts of the reviewer. If possible, are you interested in reviewing in exchange of me reviewing Barry Burton? I haven't edited Barry's article so I think I'm qualified review it. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:56, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello Tintor, I'm not particularly into reading GA articles these days because I'm not native to English and I suppose my time is limited. I apologize, and thank you for asking. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 07:53, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Barry Burton

Hello! Your submission of Barry Burton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

"Hardcore Gamer (website)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Hardcore Gamer (website) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 8 § Hardcore Gamer (website) until a consensus is reached. IceWelder [✉] 08:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ada Wong in 2023 Resident Evil 4 remake.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ada Wong in 2023 Resident Evil 4 remake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

Need an opinion

Hey, BP. I'd like your two cents on something: what do you think about the Kung Lao article? Do you think it still holds up? I'm doing the requisite Scholar search but haven't found a lot so far and I'm still working on finding viable sources, but I'm inching closer to redirecting. Thanks. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 19:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hi. Well, it survived AfD, so I feel like its fine especially an upcoming MK film will be released soon. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:29, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Barry Burton

On 11 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Barry Burton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Barry Burton's lines such as "You were almost a Jill Sandwich!" from the first Resident Evil game were popular enough to be referenced in following games? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Barry Burton. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Barry Burton), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

2 is the limit

Can you provide the link to the discussion where the FAC reviewers stated that 2 is the limit for non-free image usage? There is no such thing in Wikipedia:Featured article criteria and articles like Lightning (Final Fantasy) exist. ภץאคгöร 15:18, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

I've seen it before to other article's FAC, but I forgot. FAC is more strict nowadays, but adding either would be trivial to most reviewers since it doesn't have that much info from the discussion about her RE2 remake design. Hope you understand. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 15:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Well, if there is such a consensus/strictness as you claim, it will surely be mentioned in pages like Wikipedia:Featured article criteria. This is not something that depends on some reviewers, but rather the reviewers check whether it meets the criteria (they do not create criteria on their own). If the problem is the lack of info for RE2 remake appearance, I don't think it will be hard to gather info about it. ภץאคгöร 15:51, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

It is hard to gather info for her RE2 remake design (for me personally) since you had to use a reliable source for that. The only info we have seen so far were about the trench coat stuffs. If you still disagree, you can try to ping peer reviewers at the peer review page. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 16:11, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

OK. I'll look into it when I can. I think we can mention more than just new clothing. ภץאคгöร 16:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

@Nyxaros I rechecked right now, and unfortunately I couldn't find anything other than her "red dress" being altered into a "trenchcoat." (Valnet sources should be avoided) To be fair, her redesign appearance almost looks the same as the original RE2. I only saw a Polygon source that mentions only Leon and Claire acting like human beings or contemporary video game heroes, but not Ada. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 22:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Ada Wong

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have received your ping for the new Ada Wong FAC. I will likely not be able to do a review right away as I am trying to be better about how long I spend on Wikipedia in general, but I will get to the FAC in the near future. Best of luck with it and congrats on all of the work that you have put into the article so far. Aoba47 (talk) 23:28, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Hey Aoba. Thank you for being sincere and helpful to the article. Take your time and hope you continue to edit Wikipedia again in the near future. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words! I am still editing on here, but I am just trying to be more mindful not time in general. I've never been great with time management lol. Aoba47 (talk) 00:26, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Ah, I see hehe. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 00:27, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barry Burton

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Barry Burton you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barry Burton

The article Barry Burton you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Barry Burton and Talk:Barry Burton/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Barry Burton

The article Barry Burton you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Barry Burton for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 02:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Requesting your comment on FAC nomination

Hi! You had previously left comments on the peer review for "The Sims 4" article, and I am once again seeking your comment or feedback for the article's FAC nomination. Thank you in advance! Theknine2 (talk) 17:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

I apologize I'm not sure if I do have free time to weigh in. Maybe I'll try. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 21:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hey, BP. Does this here look like Blazewing to you? Awfully similar editing styles. 💥Casualty ^{• Hop along. •} 15:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Thats what Im thinking also, but maybe you need to observe their edits more. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 19:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Beebo the God of War

You most likely do not remember this as it was over a year ago but I do and I feel it was a Turing point in my Wikipedia career. I opened a PR for Beebo the God of War. You didn't review it but you did tell me to close it. Well I am now working to send that article to FAC and was hoping if you could provide some actual feed back. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 04:50, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

I will try, but you should definitely open another peer review if you're planning to send it to FAC. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 05:13, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

I did Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 05:29, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

GOCE request for Claire Redfield

I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article Claire Redfield. Please expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) 19:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)